Friday, May 27, 2011

How do you thread a mobile strap?

I just bought a Sony Xperia Arc. The phone is great but that's digression. the phone is quite light and is ideal for carrying around with a mobile strap. ( the phone does comes with a mobile strap hole at the bottom of the phone )

The hard part is the threading of the strap through the hole. The usual way we would go about it is an exercise in luck. We try to push the strap through one hole and hope that it will come out of the other. But usually it won't. It will get stuck right at the bottom.

Now, they should really design the strap wall with a rounded inner wall so that a simple push is all we need to thread the strap.

But no, they have to make it perpendicular, causing the strap to jam right against the wall. This being so, we need to use the right tool for the job. Comes the dental pick to the rescue ( or dental scalper, the more official name. ) See the image of the tool.

You might have tried the maneuver before using a toothpick, or a paper clip. But I'm sure it is still a frustrating experience. Not so with the scalper. The scalper is design to work in the narrow cavity between your teeth and it adapt easily to the narrow mobile strap hole.



Save the frustration, have fun carrying your mobile in a strap.



posted from Bloggeroid

Labels:

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

The mystery of the muddy shoe in urban Singapore

Look at this pair of muddy shoes and take a moment to ponder why in the mostly concrete and pathway Singapore do we still have a pair of muddy office shoe.

Perhaps it might help if I tell you tick this only happen roughly once every 4 years.

Perhaps it would help if I tell you that the shoe had made its way ?halfway across a muddy field in the late evening.

The astute reader might be able to guess that the shoe had, along with its owner attended opposition rally in the pre electional run up.

With this revelation comes the real question - why are opposition election rallies conducted at unsheltered muddy fields while the incumbent's rallies are at the relatively comfortable sports stadium.

It could be that the opposition are skimpping on the rental cost and had opt for the cheap and perhaps free open field.

Or it could be that the incumbent had arrange for this inconvenience to the opposition.

Whatever the cause, it seems to me in poor taste. This seems to indicate that the incumbent is unsure about their own popularity and must resort to trickery to win the votes.

There has been calls beseeching the citizens towards a graceful society.

Yet when the callers themselves are ungracious, it is hard press to heed those calls.

posted from Bloggeroid

Sunday, August 01, 2010

Buddhism and Science Symposium : Emotional Awareness: Cultivating Mental Balance and Leading a Good Life.


First, a word of apology for the rough state of this post. I had initially though that the post would be a short piece of work. However, it turned out to be more involved. The post need to be edited for more organisation, to highlight and flesh out the individual ideas. For the benefit of readers, however, I will publish the post first, in the hope that some readers will find the, albeit rough, post useful. And in more opportunate in futures, I will come back to revise this post.


Date: Thursday, 15 July 2010


Time: 7.00 pm to 10.00 pm


Topic: "Emotional Awareness: Cultivating Mental Balance and Leading a Good Life."



The Symposium is opened by Minister of Foreign Affair George Yeo, who despite himself being a Catholic, has been supportive of Buddhism activities.


The speakers at the talk are Dr. B. Alan Wallace, Dr. Paul Ekman, and Venerable (Dr.) Jing Yin.


At the talk itself, however, the audience is informed that, due to health reason, Dr. Paul Ekman is unable to make it for the talk, but he have prepared a video recording for the talk.


Venerable (Dr.) Jing Yin


The theme of the symposium being emotion, as opposed to popular beliefs about emotions, he said that emotions should not be totally condemn. This is because emotions can be channelled into constructive activities as well.


He believes that desire by itself is neither good nor bad. But it generally leads to the problem that he succinctly put as, "What we have, we don't want. What we want, we don't have.". As it is, most people are living in the realm of desire, thus this leads to a lot of emotional baggages.


He believes that emotions changes come from 3 main sources.



  • External Wants

  • Internal Wants

  • Contemplation


As you can see 2 of the 3 sources are internal. Yet, most people derives their emotions mostly from their External Wants. This is the reason why most people are emotionally vulnerable.


Also, most people focus too much on actions instead of the origin / the meaning behind the action. The origin should be the more important is it not? This can be seen in some understanding in the concept of Karma where people beliefs in Karma leads to their action or behavior. This is against the natural flow of Karma, where the origin is the actions and behaviour, that leads to the Karma.


To quote his illustration, if Karma is the result of an written test, people are often too focus on their desired result of the test to see that to get that, they have to first take the test, to start writing well. If they do well, now, then the result will come.


The key difference is in the location of the focus. Is one focusing on the origin or on the action? i.e. Is one living in the Present or living in their Expectations?


People tend to put too much focus on subjective experiences (Expectations) which leads to excessive desires and hence emotions. This is not an innate behaviour but is a learnt response that is reinforced through our cultural, and social habits.


From a bigger perspective, the root cause of our negative emotions is the I. Expectation resides within the I. This is why progress can only come from self realisation. To put in another way, is it "condition over mind" or is it "mind over conditions" It is something like Anthony's Robbin's The Inner Power kind of thinking.


He believes that enlightenment is a state of mind - a state of total understanding and a state where the mind is not affected by the environment. Take Buddha's enlightenment as an example, it doesn't mean that after enlightenment, Buddha gets to live in another world, realm. He is still living within the same world as the rest of us. But he is no longer as affected by the events that transpires in the world. Though, from another perspective, you can say that he does have "another world" that is, his inner world. The world where he have absolute control.


To sum it up, what we are to get from this is to accept the environment and work with it rather than seeking solutions in our expectation of the environment.


Dr. B. Alan Wallace


Dr Alan started off the discourse by quoting the following from Dr. Paul.


Who we are is the sum of all that have come to pass. Not just through our own experience, but by the millions of lives who had come to pass and have directly or indirectly affected our lives. From the hunter gatherers of the pre-historic times to your immediate circles of family and friends. This perspective is a good starting point for one to be appreciative about life.


However, as human kind progress through our technologies, our standard of living, our strategies for the mental, emotional realm did not. We are lagging behind in our pursuit of happiness. Many are living by the hunter gatherer approach to survival which would not work in the modern society as there is not enough resource to be hunted / gathered - the basis of society have changed.


People looking for what kind of live, of what kind of houses, of friends etc. The "looking for what kind" approach IS the hunter gatherer approach.


Dr Wallace believes that there are 2 sources of happiness, as explained below.


The first is happiness that comes through good fortune, from environmental simulants. i.e. meaningful acts that one


experiences. These are external sources of happiness. And so he pose the question - what happens when we take them away?


Do we lose the happiness?


The second source is what we are able to give to the world. It is not what you get from the "looking for what kind" approach. It can be as simple as living life by the simple maxims - Not to do to other what you will not like done to you, or did my best not to harm. These maxims are about what you can give, as oppose to what you will receive. And this is the genuine happiness.


How then, do we move from the hunter gatherer mode to a cultivation mode? The first step is to see youself, be aware of


oneself. To know the truth.


It has been said before that the truth shall set you free. And indeed, it is the truth about oneself that is the most important towards emotional balance. Know Thyself! If getting into better emotional state is the destination, and someone gave you a map, that is still not enough. You need to figure out your current location on the map first. Your location is precisely your current emotional state.


As part of this journey, we need to develop our conscious attention. To move from what makes me happy, to the truth. To move from lamenting a regrettable act after the deed, to being able to stop ourself from commiting the regrettable act in the first place. To Shifting / cultivate our conscious attention to what we could give, and contribute, rather than what do we expect.


Constructive Emotions vs Destructive Emotions


in achieving emotional balance, it is helpful to distinguish between constructive and destructive emotions. Constructive emotions are emotion which are supportive of ourselves and others. And they gives us genuine happiness.


Conversely, destructive emotions are non supportive emotions about ourselves or others, and which doesn't give genuine happiness.


For finding the meaning of life, Dr. Wallace proposed a reductionist solution - try to strip the non-essential from your life, so that at the end of the process, What is left will be the things that are truly important to you.


Meditation


What is meditation? (from v.JY)


Is meditation about keeping a Blank Mind? If so, one can take a brick to the head. or lie down there and sleep.


Meditation is the route to Nirvana. which can be seens as cultivating a way of benevolence. It is about awaress, education, understanding, seeing the wole, acceptance, living consciously. Living consciously is to be conscious of what is happening.


A good life is about what the individual can give to the world.


Awareness is the key to controlling our emotions.


Emotions evolve from our hunter gatherer heritage, is a survival mechanism to allow us to make decisions quickly. For example, in a car accident, our heighten emotion of fear enables us to make split seconds decision. In this kind of no-time-to-think situations, if we have to think we would have died. This is how emotions such as fear can save one's life.


However, in non critical situation, Emotions can get us into troubles as it is simply not appropriate.


There are 7 kinds of basic /primary emotions, with hundreds if not thousands of nuances and variations. They are as follows:


Angers


Fear


Regrets


Sadness


Surprise


Enjoyment


Contempt (Superiority)


As mentioned, each of the above represent a family of experiences.


The way emotions work is that each emotion have generic triggers. For example. The trigger for Anger is when a pursuit of a goal is blocked. This being said, different experience may install different triggers across different individuals. Tramatic childhood experiences may install distorted triggers.


We will need to use conscious attention to cure / remove the destructive triggers. That is, we will need to start with awareness of the triggers, then condition ourself to deactivate the triggers.


Every emotions can be constructive or destructive. We can measure this by looking at the subsequent interactions that the emotions bring forth. i.e. feelings, reactions, to similar triggers.


Impulse arrives to set off a series of actions. The gap between the impulse and action is like the spark before the flame. We need to be aware of both our impulse and the gap, that is one of the criteria towards enlightenment.


The speed of our emotions is equal to the gap between the impulse and the action. Some people's are fast in this aspect and we call them temperamental. Others are slow in this aspect, and we call them cool ice.


One way to raise our awareness of this is to practise way mindful meditation.


Another way is to keep a diary of regrettable emotional episode. Noting down details such as what is the trigger, what is the behaviour, and the ways in which this behaviour is harmful. And following up by reviewing the diary, to reviews the trigger. Be familiar with them, because familiarity with them can help one to recognize it.


The aim is to become aware that one is emotional when one is emotional. When we find it hard to be aware of our emotional states, we can start by trying to become more aware of the sensations that we have. We can support this process by doing memory exercises and physical exercises, that help us to become more aware of our physical body and our biased memory process during emotional episodes.


In the grip of emotions, the mind is not fully used. In the journey towards emotional awareness, we must start with the awareness of our body, then of our feelings, only then can we be awareness our emotions.


We should not be rejecting even the negatives emotions, because they are there to serve a purpose. Instead, we should strive to be more aware of them, to grow the fullness of the experience. However, we do not let them control us, our actions, our mind.


Reaching out to people is never a one way traffic, it is about interaction. One need to respond to their response to maximise the effect.


I have to appologize for not crediting the individual speaker where it is due. In the midst of my hectic note taking, I had neglected to note down who said what. And the post as it is now, is very rough, I will come back again to revise it in hopefully within the next 2 months. I hope this blog is useful to some readers as it is now though.


Last Edited: 2010.08.01.1749hrs(Sun);

Wednesday, July 07, 2010

a note about meta thinking

I have recently blog about meta thinking in another blog. The article highlighted the importance of meta-thinking in the context of productivity.


The reason I'm linking to it is because meta thinking is a philosophical concept that is central to the idea of change. Meta thinking can be used to structure changes!


Do go over there to take a look at it at


http://my.opera.com/CYDE/blog/2008/06/19/how-important-is-meta-thinking




Technorati :

Del.icio.us :

Labels:

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

Taking responsibility

Taking responsibility




A share of the beliefs and perspective on this page those of Anthony Robin. Whose material I will encourage all readers to explore.




How many of us have actually taken responsible of our lives? Would you think the question absurd? Is it presposterous to think that we have not been taking responsibility of our individual lives?




Have you ever thought about how you want to live your life? If you have not thought about that, then can you say that one is responsible for one's life?




Perhaps we need to first to define the word responsibility.




To be responsible is to take control. Yet, in our lives, there are many things beyond our control. Does this mean that it is impossible to be responsible of one's life? It is useful here to make a distinction between external events and internal events. We are not able to control certain external events, but we are able to control our interpretation of it.




There are different ways to face death - fighting to go down, or to be paralysed by the fear.




There are different ways to face life - moving towards your dreams, or to be waiting for things to happen, for death.




What is your choice?




There has been many names - purposeful living, mindful living, meaningful living, But under pinning all of these methods is the idea that that one have to be responsible for one's action and behavior.




We need to take charge of our emotions. Of the way we feel. All too frequently people feel that they are victim of the circumstance. But success is not due to what happened, but rather to what you make of what happened.




Anthony Robin had said that one of the belief that we should espouse is that we create our world. To put it in another way, we need to be take responsibility for the world that we live in. To be responsible for our world is to be able to handle any problems that comes along. The converse is that we will not be able to handle the problems that comes along.






Simply because they are "someone elses problem".




It is never too late to take responsible in our actions, in our beliefs, in our life.





Labels:

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Faith vs Blind Faith



http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/richard_dawkins_on_militant_atheism.html




I've just watched the TED video given by Richard Dawkin where he urges atheists to be more out spoken about their beliefs. His delivery is humourous but thought provoking and powerful.




The talk is recorded in 2006, and released in 2007 and I've watch it in 2010 - It's 2 years late. But I assure you that the content is still insightful. The perspective that he puts forward is one that every human being must embrace to become a world citizen. I would urge anyone who have not watch it to




Richard Dawkin is a biologist who is one of the most out-spoken atheist around. To that cause, he have founded a organisation call The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science, whose purpose




One of the things that he feels strongly about is that religious growth is detrimental to science advancement. I feel pretty much the same as well.




Generally, faith is good. Confidence can be thought of as having faith in one's ability. Having faith in a person, necessary means that one believe that the person will is able to get the job done. Having faith in life means having confidence in our ability to reach our goal.




Thus, Faith translates into action. And the inverse is also true - no faith (no confidence) in oneself translate to inaction.




Where does Faith come from? From knowledge and skills. It come from doing things.










Blind faith is different. It doesn't come from knowledge and skills. It doesn't come from doing things. It comes from the herd mentality - that we follow what the others are doing blindly. This is not to say that it is absolutely dangerous. It really depends on where is the herd going. However, it represents a lack of thinking, a lack of awareness, a lack of plan. and that is dangerous in the long run.




Would you live a life where the thinking is done by another person? That is effectively what blind faith is about. So have faith, but not blind faith.





Monday, December 14, 2009

Source of Happiness

When your happiness depends on other people, you know you've got a problem


Why should your happiness be dependent on other? Because of love? Because of success


Your success might depends on other persons, afterall, teamwork is a essential ingredient of success. All of us are happy when we succeeded, but happiness ! = success. And being happy is more often a matter of perspective than of absolute.




Come to think of it, when is the last time you are happy because everything is great? Probably a very very long time ago? When is the last time you are happy because something turn out great? Quite recently? My point is that we can learn to be happy anytime anywhere if we can learn to control our focus on the happy aspects.